Back to articlesRoom: Discover the world
THE YORIMICHI LIBRARYBOOK 05
Everyday scienceFollowing the researchText: about 3 min

The smell of rain, revisited: can tiny bubbles carry bacteria, too?

From the 2015 discovery of bursting bubbles to the 2017 experiments with living bacteria. A pleasant smell became a question about the movement of matter.

Estimated time for the article text only. Allow extra time for figures, comparisons and interactive exhibits.

Choose where to start reading

AI-generated illustration of a shallow puddle beside wet soil and stones. It is not an observational photograph of microbes or aerosols.
AI-generated illustration · Not a photograph of microbial or aerosol experiments.
The main idea

The 2015 work revealed a transport mechanism. The 2017 work added experiments with living bacteria. The scale and effects outdoors are further, separate questions.

THEN, AND SINCE THEN

The story continues.

The publication dates of research and other sources are distinguished from the dates when they were checked for this article. This timeline does not attempt to cover all the latest research.

  1. Announcement

    Aerosol generation by bubbles is announced

    Tiny droplets were observed forming when a water droplet struck a porous surface. Transport of odor-producing substances and other material was discussed as a possible consequence of this mechanism.

    Evidence from this point in time ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  2. Follow-up

    Follow-up experiments use bacteria

    Experiments confirmed bacteria in aerosols released from soil and their survival. The work moved from discovering a mechanism to testing the living organisms it could carry.

    Evidence from this point in time ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  3. Source check

    Editorial source check—not a new research announcement

    The materials for the initial and follow-up studies above were checked again. This is neither a review covering every subsequent paper nor a date guaranteeing the latest scientific conclusion.

    Evidence from this point in time ↗ (opens in a new tab)
FIELD NOTE · From observation to verification

What was observed? What cannot yet be concluded?

2015

Film the mechanism

From a droplet's impact to the release of tiny dropletsThe left shows a water droplet falling toward the ground. The center shows air bubbles trapped at the base of the droplet after impact. The right schematically shows bubbles rising and bursting, releasing tiny droplets into the air. These are not observation photographs or reproductions of the timing or scale.

What was observed and testedDroplet impact → air bubbles → bursting and tiny droplets. High-speed imaging recorded this sequence.

What this evidence alone cannot tell usThis did not explain every smell associated with rain or all effects outdoors.

Evidence behind the diagram:MIT News — Rainfall can release aerosols, study finds (2015-01-14) ↗ (opens in a new tab)

2017

Check for living bacteria

Collecting droplets released from soil and testing them by culturingThe left shows water droplets being dropped onto soil containing bacteria. The center shows a schematic container for collecting the released droplets. The right shows a Petri dish used to test survival by culturing. The apparatus shapes and colony counts do not reproduce experimental data.

What was observed and testedWater droplets onto soil containing bacteria → aerosol collection → culturing. Transfer and survival of bacteria were confirmed.

What this evidence alone cannot tell usThis did not measure the probability of infection from ordinary rain or the scale of long-distance transport.

Evidence behind the diagram:MIT News — A light rain can spread soil bacteria far and wide, study finds (2017-03-07) ↗ (opens in a new tab)

An editorial schematic comparison based on existing sources. These are not experimental photographs, and the diagrams are not to scale. The 2017 explanation relies on the MIT announcement that could be read; it does not imply verification of the full Nature paper. "Not verified" marks the limits of this review, not a claim that the question has never been researched.

FIELD NOTE 01

The starting point: what a smell is and how it travels are different questions

The earthy smell after rain. Knowing which substances produce it does not fully explain why it reaches your nose from the ground. Here we follow research on a mechanism that moves material from the soil surface into the air, rather than research identifying every component of the smell. Change the question from "What is it made of?" to "How does it move?" and a story about chemistry connects with the physics of fluids.

An editorial perspective This section offers comparisons and questions based on facts in the sources. It does not claim a shared underlying principle or present new research results.

FIELD NOTE 02

2015: bubbles burst inside raindrops

An MIT research team used high-speed imaging to study raindrop-like water droplets striking wettable, porous surfaces. Under the right conditions, small air bubbles formed inside the droplets and burst, releasing even finer droplets. These became airborne aerosols. Large splashes were not the only route from the ground into the air: events inside a droplet could also carry material. The work suggested a possible way to transport substances responsible for smells, but it did not demonstrate the cause of every smell associated with rain.

FIELD NOTE 03

2017: from "it could carry material" to experiments with bacteria

Follow-up work progressed to dropping water onto soil containing bacteria, collecting the ejected aerosols, and culturing them. The researchers found cases in which bacteria moved from the soil into droplets and survived for at least one hour after aerosol formation. The key advance is that the physical transport pathway observed in 2015 was joined in 2017 by a different piece of evidence: living bacteria could also be transferred. This study did not measure the probability of infection on rainy days.

Think it through with the article's evidence

How would you rewrite this headline?

"When the smell of rain is stronger, there are more bacteria in the air." Do the experiments you have read about support this headline?

First, find what was measured
The strength of the smell and the amount of bacteria outdoors: no experiment establishing a relationship between these is within this article's verified scope.
Return to what the experiment can support
"A water droplet's impact can sometimes eject droplets containing living bacteria." Read this as a result tied to particular conditions.

What this tells usThe existence of a pathway and the amount by which bacteria increase outdoors are different questions. Return to the article to check the conditions missing from a headline.

Can we say "a stronger smell means more bacteria"?

The evidence checked for this article does not establish that relationship. The limit here is that smell intensity should not be treated as a measure of bacterial quantity or safety.

Read a little furtherFrom experiment to outdoors, what is still unknown? Read the limits of this source check →

This interpretation uses the same sources as the article. It does not present new experimental results.

Check the evidence behind this interpretation

Sources checked:. The sources have not been revisited or checked for updates on this occasion.

FIELD NOTE 04

A comparison: does rain wash particles out or send them into the air?

At first, these sound contradictory. But a raindrop collecting particles as it falls through the air and a droplet releasing tiny droplets when it strikes the ground occur in different places and at different stages. A separate MIT study investigated aerosol collection by falling droplets. "Rain cleans the air" and "rain releases particles" can both be valid explanations when their conditions are retained. One experiment alone cannot determine whether the overall amount increases or decreases.

FIELD NOTE 05

The 2026 source check: what was established and what we have not followed up

For this article, we checked the 2015 mechanism study, the 2017 follow-up study involving bacteria, and the associated MIT announcements. The 2017 announcement also explains that results vary with soil type, temperature, impact speed, and other conditions. October 29, 2026 is this article's source verification date, not a claim that it covers all research through that date. This review does not establish how much long-distance transport occurs outdoors, what fraction of the total release comes from rain, or how later replication studies may have changed the estimates.

FIELD NOTE 06

A perspective to take away: a discovery creates new experiments, not just answers

A single line such as "the mystery of rain's smell is solved" hides what was tested afterward. Filming a mechanism, measuring what it carries, and establishing its scale outdoors are three different tasks. Separating them reveals both progress and unresolved questions. When a science story catches your attention, try making separate notes for the observed phenomenon, the proposed explanation, and the effects in the real environment. This turns surprise into a question that can keep being tested.

An editorial perspective This section offers comparisons and questions based on facts in the sources. It does not claim a shared underlying principle or present new research results.

COMPARE THE MECHANISMS

Side by side, the differences become visible.

Comparing mechanisms and representations
Situation comparedWhat happens?What this does not establish
A raindrop falling through the airIt may collect airborne particlesNot every particle is necessarily removed
A water droplet striking the groundUnder suitable conditions, it releases tiny dropletsThis does not mean that every surface and rainfall produces the same amount
Experiments using bacteriaSoil bacteria may enter aerosols and surviveThis is not proof that ordinary rain directly causes disease

Sources and verification notes

This article is an original synthesis of primary sources and explanations from specialist institutions.

Generative AI assists with research, structure and English translation. Claims are compared with sources and editorial checks are performed; independent specialist and native-English reviews have not yet been completed.

  1. Joung & Buie / Nature CommunicationsAerosol generation by raindrop impact on soil (2015 study) ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  2. MIT NewsRainfall can release aerosols, study finds (2015-01-14) ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  3. MIT NewsA light rain can spread soil bacteria far and wide, study finds (2017-03-07) ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  4. Joung, Ge & Buie / Nature CommunicationsBioaerosol generation by raindrops on soil (2017 study; bibliographic details and abstract checked) ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  5. MIT NewsCan rain clean the atmosphere? (2015-08-28; comparison with a separate study) ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Sources checked:
Verified on 2026-10-29. Read MIT's initial announcement, its follow-up research announcement, and its announcement of a separate particle-collection study. For the 2015 paper, text retrieved through search was checked; for the 2017 paper, the abstract and bibliographic details retrieved through search were checked. Directly opening the paper text produced an access error. Details of the follow-up research rely on the text of MIT's announcement. No systematic review of work after 2017 or health-risk assessment was conducted. The reasons for links to other fields are editorial comparisons.

Rights, status, and revision history
Status
Free public edition. Preparation and revision history is retained below.
Print
0.4.2
Rights to the text and diagrams
The text and diagrams are original. The opening image was generated with AI and supplied by the PM (the generation date of 2026-10-31 is reported by the PM). It is not evidence from an experiment or observation, or evidence of heart positions, anatomy, or ecology. No external source text or audio recordings are reproduced.
How sources are used
Sources are referenced by links only. All rights to each source remain with its respective rights holders.
  1. · v0.1.0 — Created an original prototype article and checked its references.
  2. · v0.2.0 — Expanded the article into a flagship feature. Added a comparison, timeline, conceptual diagram, and links explaining connections to other fields.
  3. · v0.3.0 — Added evidence for each section, topic-specific SVG diagrams, and varied reading structures. Updated the map feature with comparisons calculated from projection formulas and controls for switching projections.
  4. · v0.3.1 — Added the AI-generated cover image supplied by the project manager and guidance on where to begin reading. Kept the original image unchanged; distribution versions only crop, resize, or convert it to WebP. The image is not evidence of an experiment, observation, anatomy, or ecology. Left the text, sources, and source verification dates unchanged. The changes had not been tested in a browser.
  5. · v0.4.0 — Added topic-specific reading activities that work without JavaScript, along with links explaining how each next question connects. Preserved the original scientific text, diagram conditions, sources, and source verification dates. Sources were not revisited, and the changes had not been tested in a browser.
  6. · v0.4.1 — Added question-specific paths from comparisons back to the article. Moved the sky comparison into the introduction, and refocused the rain activity from repeating the timeline to examining headlines. Made the distinction between the octopus's AI-generated cover and its diagram of roles clear at the outset, as well as the distinction between the freely readable space-sound material and the membership display demo. Preserved the scientific text, diagrams, sources, and verification dates. Sources were not revisited, and the changes had not been tested in a browser.
  7. · v0.4.2 — Added links explaining connections to articles in other fields introduced in v14. Preserved the scientific text, diagrams, sources, and source verification dates. Screen reviews are recorded separately.

For another read, another day.

Email a correction or observation about this article

PASS IT ON

Pass this discovery on.

Send it to someone curious, or save a link for another day.

Show the link to copy

Select the URL to copy it.

THE NEXT BOOK

A new question, on the next shelf.

These paths are editorial comparisons and associations. They do not claim that different subjects work by the same principle.

Everyday science Everyday science

Rain carries particles. What does air do to light?

In the rain experiments, small droplets carried material into the air. In a clear sky, air molecules change the direction of light. Rather than equating the movement of smells with a blue sky, explore a different mechanism at work in the air.

Where does the sky's blue come from?
Everyday science Space

Is what was filmed the same as what can be concluded?

In the rain experiments, we distinguished bubbles caught on camera from their subsequent effects outdoors. With sounds from space, distinguish observed structures from their conversion into something audible. Both offer a way to ask how far conclusions can reach beyond what we have seen or heard.

From the "sounds" of space to reading a map.
Everyday science Ways of seeing

How do we read "correct" together with its conditions?

The meaning of the rain experiment changes if surface and impact conditions are omitted. A map is also judged differently depending on whether we are comparing areas or finding a route. This detour recovers the conditions attached to a conclusion; it does not treat the scientific mechanisms as identical.

How much truth is there in "big" on a map?
Everyday science Language & culture

Will "let's meet shiasatte if it's sunny" be understood?

For rain, we checked the limits of what could be said. Next, turn to an ordinary meeting arrangement. Put a word you think you know—shiasatte, a Japanese relative-date word—onto a calendar, and a difference in meaning becomes visible.

If you agree to meet “shiasatte,” will you arrive on the same day?

Choose your next article

The articles below follow an editorial selection. For connections between their subjects, see the suggested next stops above.